خط مشی دسترسیدرباره ما
ثبت نامثبت نام
راهنماراهنما
فارسی
ورودورود
صفحه اصلیصفحه اصلی
جستجوی مدارک
تمام متن
منابع دیجیتالی
رکورد قبلیرکورد بعدی
Record identifier : 567931
Personal Name - Primary Intelectual Responsibility : Henry, Patrick Gilbert
Title and statement of responsibility : Metarealism and the question of Russian postmodernism [Thesis]
Publication, Distribution,Etc. : University of California, Berkeley, 2006
Language of the Item : eng
Dissertation of thesis details and type of degree : Ph.D.
Body granting the degree : , University of California, Berkeley
Summary or Abstract : Most leading accounts of Russian postmodernism are based on an understanding of Soviet reality as a total semiotic system thoroughly mediated by ideology that effectively replaced, and thereby eliminated, any other reality. When scholars and critics turn their attention to the art of the late-Soviet/postmodern period, they naturally focus on those artists whose work engages with (interrogates, parodies, deconstructs) Soviet reality as these scholars have defined it. In other words, they seek out the artists who are, in their terms, most demonstrably "post." Given their central concern with the semiotic constructedness and ideological determination of Soviet civilization, most commentators therefore concentrate on two related and frequently overlapping directions in unofficial late-Soviet art: sots-art and, to a lesser extent, Moscow conceptualism. Such has been the focus on sots-art and Moscow conceptualism in critical and scholarly accounts of Russian postmodernism, particularly outside of Russia, that it may come as a surprise to learn that in the 1980s another trio of poets was far more visible than the conceptualists: Aleksandr Eremenko, Aleksei Parshchikov and Ivan Zhdanov, the principal subjects of this study. For more than 20 years these three poets have been associated with the term "metarealism," which Mikhail Epshtein introduced in 1983 to designate what he regarded as one pole of contemporary literature, the second being conceptualism. The status of metarealism within Russian postmodernism remains a bone of contention to this day. Russian scholars, critics and even the authors of secondary school literature textbooks routinely classify the metarealist poets as postmodernists. Yet such authors just as routinely discuss the work of the metarealists only in passing, if at all, in their studies of postmodernist literature as a whole. Even Epshtein, who has most forcefully made the case for the importance of metarealism in the literature of the late 1970s and 1980s, disregards it in his broader speculations on the Russian postmodern. The first goal of this study will be to demonstrate both the coherence and the distinctiveness of metarealism as represented by the poetry of Eremenko, Parshchikov and Zhdanov. Secondly, this study will argue that metarealism is essential to an adequate account of Russian postmodernism..
Topical Name Used as Subject : Slavic literature
Information of biblio record : TL
 
 
 
(در صورت عدم وضوح تصویر اینجا را کلیک نمایید)